A striking visual difference has emerged in recent student protests. One side shows the physical strain of an extended hunger strike, with reports of declining health and medical risks. The other features celebratory videos and public dancing after demands were met.
This contrast between prolonged fasting and festive displays has drawn attention to differing approaches in activism. Neha Bora, national president of the All India Students’ Association, took part in a protest at Jantar Mantar in Delhi. The group, described as a left-wing student organization, called for accountability on exam irregularities. Reports indicated that Bora and two others had fasted for 20 days by July 17, with medical staff noting high-risk conditions. The strike ended after 23 days following appeals from politicians and public figures.
After the Union Education Minister resigned on July 25, a video of Bora dancing circulated widely. She shared it with a caption referencing revolution and dance. While the end of the fast allowed for celebration, the quick shift from reported weakness to energetic movement raised questions about the protest’s presentation.
In Jharkhand, student leader Devendra Nath Mahto conducted a separate hunger strike over recruitment exam issues. By the 15th day, reports noted dehydration and low blood pressure, requiring hospital monitoring. He was admitted to Ranchi’s Sadar Hospital. The protest concluded after 16 days when the state government canceled the disputed JSSC-CGL exam and another related test.
Mahto’s case produced images of medical treatment and physical decline. Bora’s protest ended with widely shared footage of celebration. Both used the same tactic but generated contrasting public images. Bora, a JNU scholar, later faced objections from some Jharkhand protesters during a solidarity visit, including heckling and an ink-throwing incident on August 7.
